History of War Coverage Essay -- essays research papers fc

struggle Coverage     Edward R. Murrow, precedent reporter for CBS once said, We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We result not be driven by fear into an age of unreason if weremember that we are not descended from fearful men, not from men who feared to write, to speak, to fellow and to defend causes which were, for the moment unpopular. Times are changing when it comes to the media covering wars. on that point was once a time in our country when journalists were not afeared(predicate) to report the realities and atrocities, to a reasonable extent, that occurred during wartime. During the Vietnam conflict America saw what rattling was happening in the jungle on the other side of the humanity and it enabled citizens to form their own opinions about the war. Recent wars, such as the disconnection War and Operation Iraqi Freedom do not endure the citizens of the United States to see and experience what is really happening. We see a hygienize ve rsion of the war, we are shown only material that boosts moral and support for the man and our government, but we do not see enough of the war to earn that everything does not go as smooth as it seems. War insurance coverage has changed over the years in many aspects. Freedom of the journalists, the relationship surrounded by the press and the military and the technology are the significant aspects of change in war coverage.     The Second World War was covered in a elbow room that is very different than what we are used to today. The news was aired mainly by radio because television was still in its earlyish days during the war. The journalists and the military were more allies than enemies, with each of them helping the other. When it came to the boilers suit purpose of the war, the US correspondents (and their Allied counterparts) were no less committed to the foiling of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan than were the commanders who led their troops int o battle. As a result, the notion that our armed forces needed somehow to "handle" the press was irrelevant. pressure sensation relations--or "media" relations, as the Pentagon would have phrased it--did not yet exist in the way we recognize them from our post-Vietnam experience (Rather). There was a sense of mutual obligingness between the two organizations in World War II, they both understand what they were out there to accomplish. Although the relationship between t... ...lemmas and government.Works CitedBarhart, Aaron. Speeding Up War Coverage. Television Week. Apr. 2003.      donnish depend Premier. EBSCOhost. U. of capital of Connecticut Lib. 1 whitethorn 2005     .     Hernandez, Debra Gersh. The simple days of war coverage. Editor &type A      Publisher. Jul. 1994. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost.     U. of Hartford Lib. 1 May 2005. .Newseum War Storie s Technology. War Reporting & Technology.      1 May 2005.     .Rather, Dan. Truth on the Battlefield. Harvard International Review.      Spring 2001. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. U. of Hartford Lib.     1 May 2005. .Rosenberg, Jim. Tech from Gulf War to Gulf War. Editor & Publisher. March 2003. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. U. of Hartford Lib. 1 May 2005. .     Shafer, Jack. Embeds and Unilaterals. 1 May 2003.           . 1 May 2005.